Governor Nixon vetoed 22 bills in the 2016 regular session. The veto session in which the General Assembly will consider only those bills returned by Governor Nixon convenes on September 14. SB 586, relating to charter schools, has already been overridden. Here is a short summary of some the bills vetoed by the Governor this last session:
* HB1414 [SCS HB 1414] - This bill would have allowed for a voluntary reporting of agricultural information that is now mandatory. Governor Nixon vetoed the bill arguing the public has the right to know the information.
* HB1432 [SS#2 SCS HCB HB 1432] - This bill requires a hearing within 60 days of an employee being placed on administrative leave. Governor Nixon vetoed the bill arguing that it would make it harder for employers to punish employees and would give procedural rights to employees not currently entitled to such protections.
* HB 1631 [SC#2 SCS HCS HB 1631] - This is Missouri's take on a voter ID bill, requiring government-issued photo ID to vote. This is similar to a bill that Nixon vetoed in 2011. We'll see if there are votes to override the veto this session.
* SB 591 [SCS SB 591] - This bill would modify Missouri's statute regarding expert testimony to essentially put in place the Daubert standard used in federal courts and many other states. The bill had a fair number of Republicans vote against it on its initial passage so it is doubtful there will be the votes to override the veto.
* SB 847 [SS#2 SB 847] - This bill would have ramifications for the collateral source rule and damages evidence in personal injury cases. If passed, parties could introduce evidence of the actual cost, rather than the value, of the medical care or treatment to the plaintiff. The bill would also repeal a provision of law which provides that there is a rebuttable presumption that the value of the medical treatment provided is represented by the dollar amount necessary to satisfy the financial obligation to the health care provider. The bill would provide that the actual cost of the medical care or treatment shall not exceed the dollar amounts paid by or on behalf of a patient whose care is at issue plus any remaining amount necessary to satisfy the financial obligation for medical care by a health care provided after adjustment for any contractual discounts, or price reduction.
Tim West, MO Legislative Monitor
LAKC Board of Directors